Actually, that's a bit of a rhetorical question. Or is it? Although I do not fully agree with Mark Oppenheimer's essay in the Chronicle of Higher Education, I can sympathize with his lament that too many Americans are too poorly read. But I wholly endorse the following statement, and would enthusiastically extend it beyond graduate students:
I have long believed that admissions committees at graduate schools should work very differently. Instead of asking for letters of recommendation from undergraduate thesis advisers, admissions committees should try to figure out if an applicant is an intellectual. They should ask: "What do you read outside your proposed field of study? What are your favorite books? Where would you most like to travel, and why? What periodicals do you read?" If a student has no aspirations to travel, doesn't seem to read much except within her undergraduate major, and shows no interest in academic debates — well, that's a bad candidate for academe. A bright, kind, loyal person, perhaps, who could be a success in many ways. But a bad candidate for the academy that America needs.
One could, I suppose, quibble with the verbiage. But let's stipulate that it is 98.9 percent correct. A friend of ours recently recounted a series of interviews he'd help conduct with candidates for national and state office. And the theme was a depressing one: earnest people who desire to serve the public but who know nothing or next to nothing. Now, I would like to ask those aspirants to public office: What are you reading? Could be the daily paper (bare minimum) or it could be Boswell's Life of Johnson. But it had better be something.
What am I reading?
Well, I do read The New York Review of Books, although I much prefer the Claremont alternative. And I just renewed my subscription to the New Criterion for two years. Right now, I'm juggling Paul Johnson's "Creators," Jaroslav Pelikan's "Vindication of Tradition", the new edition of "War: Ends and Means," by Angelo Codevilla and Paul Seabury, and "God's Terrorists," by Charles Allen.
Posted by H.L. Monkey at September 20, 2006 09:13 PMA list? Did someone ask for a list????
Periodicals I read routinely include The Atlantic, Table Talk and InfoWorld - fortunately I'm not trying to get into an Ivy League school any time soon.
Books later...
Posted by: Monkey RobbL at September 21, 2006 09:47 AMThe Claremont Review of Books? I wouldn't even use that worthless rag to line my bird cage.
Posted by: the elder at September 21, 2006 11:32 AMI got about halfway through this post and just gave up. Could you put some pictures or something in next time?
Posted by: Poochucker at September 21, 2006 12:40 PMI can't believe I forgot to include MacWorld on my list of monthly reads. Sorry Jason!
Like I said, books later...
Posted by: Monkey RobbL at September 21, 2006 03:07 PMHewitt was right about you, Chad.
Posted by: H.L. Monkey at September 21, 2006 08:26 PMMy last three books:
How Boots Fooled The King by Meave Bletchly-Willsthorpe
The Little Blue Mouse By Millicent Arglesburg
Quantum Heterostructures: Microelectronics and Optoelectronics by Vladimir Mitin
Work stuff not icluded, I don't miss an issue of Bicycling magazine. It's not great, but the field is thin. I'm currently reading The Mother Tongue: English & How It Got That Way by Bill Bryson, and Healing the Hardware of the Soul: How Making the Brain-Soul Connection Can Optimize Your Life, Love, and Spiritual Growth by Dr. Daniel Amen.