As should be the custom every year this day, we celebrate "the most memorable epocha in the history of America." Here is the text of John Adams' letters to Abigail on the occasion of the resolution to draft the Declaration of Independence. The letter he wrote the evening of July 3 should be read and re-read by every American -- especially this clown. Raise a glass to freedom and, like the man says, read the whole thing...
Philadelphia July 3d. 1776Posted by H.L. Monkey at July 2, 2007 09:40 PMHad a declaration of independence been made seven months ago, it would have been attended with many great and glorious effects. We might, before this hour, have formed alliance with foreign states. We should have mastered Quebec, and been in possession of Canada.
You will, perhaps, wonder how such a declaration would have influenced our affairs in Canada; but, if I could write with freedom, I could easily convince you that it would, and explain to you the manner how. Many gentlemen in high stations, and of great influence, have been duped, by the ministerial bubble of commissioners, to treat; and, in real, sincere expectation of this event, which they so fondly wished, they have been slow and languid in promoting measures for the reduction of that province. Others there are in the colonies, who really wished that our enterprise in Canada would be defeated; that the colonies might be brought into danger and distress between two fires, and be thus induced to submit. Others really wished to defeat the expedition to Canada, lest the conquest of it should elevate the minds of the people to much to hearken to those terms of reconciliation which they believed would be offered to us. These jarring views, wishes, and designs, occasioned an opposition to many salutary measures which were proposed for the support of that expedition, and caused obstructions embarrassments, and studied delays, which have finally lost us the province.
All causes, however, in conjunction, would not have disappointed us, if it had not been for a misfortune which could not have been foreseen, and perhaps could not have been prevented – I mean the prevalence of the smallpox among our troops. This fatal pestilence completed our destruction. It is a frown of Providence upon us, which we ought to lay to heart.
But, on the other hand, the delay of this declaration to this time has many great advantages attending it. The hopes of reconciliation which were fondly entertained by multitudes of honest an well meaning, though short-sighted and mistaken people, have been gradually, and at last totally, extinguished. Time has been given for the whole people maturely to consider the great question of independence, and to ripen their judgment, dissipate their fears, and allure their hopes, by discussing it in newspapers and pamphlets – by debating it in assemblies, conventions, committees of safety and inspection – in town and country meetings, as well as in private conversations; so that the whole people, in every colony, have now adopted it as their own act. This will cement the union, and avoid those heats, and perhaps convulsions, which might have been occasioned by such a declaration six months ago.
But the day is past. The second day of July, 1776, will be the most memorable epocha in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations, as the great Anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the day of deliverance by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp, shews, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires and illuminations, from one end of the continent to the other, from this time forward forever.
You will think me transported with enthusiasm; but I am not. I am well aware of the toil, and blood, and treasure, that it will cost us to maintain this declaration, and support and defend these states. Yet, through all the gloom, I can see the rays of light and glory; I can see that the end is more than worth all the means, and that posterity will triumph, although you and I may rue, which I hope we shall not.
Well, it's hard to disagree with most of what that "clown" said. A couple of the early paragraphs seem designed to provoke, but his recounting of the despicable results of American jingoism is pretty much spot on. I also happen to agree with a lot of what John Adams says in his letter. The sentiments are not incompatible (although I'm not sure what that whole "possession of Canada" thing was all about.)
Freedom is great, and I want more of it. But flags, loyalty oaths, and other forms of state-worship are freedom's enemies, not its friends. Independence Day commemorates a great event with a noble sentiment: emancipation from an oppressive state. We should remember that: July 4th is not so much about the establishment of a new nation as it is about throwing off the shackles of an old one.
Posted by: Monkey RobbL at July 3, 2007 02:29 PMOh, there's plenty to disagree with Zinn about. Nationalism does not equal authoritarianism. To hear Zinn tell it -- and, by the way, he peddled virtually the same op-ed two years ago -- flag-waiving is a gateway activity to more dastardly deeds, like ethnic cleansing and genocide. American patriotism is one step removed from National Socialism. Nonsense. Doubly damned nonsense at that.
It's difficult to take fellows like Zinn seriously. This is a man who had kind things to say about Mao's China and Castro's Cuba. He's a fool and a Marxist. But I repeat myself.
And you're wrong, Robb. July 4th is very much about the founding of a new nation. Some of those guys even liked to call it an Empire of Liberty. But "empire" has such negative connotations these days.
Posted by: H.L. Monkey at July 3, 2007 08:28 PMI think he's arguing that Nationalism tends to lead to Imperialism, and I think history tends to support that argument. The American brand of Imperialism differs from British, Soviet, and Islamic brands (for example) but with over 175 different countries housing significant numbers of U.S. troops, it IS Imperialism.
It also leads to a sense that "it's evil when they do it, but it's okay when we do it" - and the roll-call of U.S. atrocities (some of the largest being Mexico the Phillipines, Dresden and other bombings of German civilians, Tokyo / Hiroshima / Nagasaki and Vietnam) shows the effects of that kind of thinking.
The messenger (Zinn) may be a douchebag. So-called "Progressives" are often guilty of the contrary sin - that atrocities are okay when they're done by other countries in the service of progressive ideals, but not when they're done by American in the service of democratic ideals. But the message is worth considering regardless. The past blessings of Providence - and I DO believe in Providence and his blessings - do not constitute a blank check to invade, annex, and bomb. Rather, we ought to consider whether we really believe that ALL men are created equal and endowed by their creator with the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. More importantly, we should consider if the best way to spread those ideas is with the barrel of a gun.
Posted by: Monkey RobbL at July 4, 2007 01:41 PMHey, but if we ARE gonna get nutty about flags, let's get REALLY nutty.
Posted by: Monkey RobbL at July 7, 2007 10:44 PM